Ma`rifat Modiriyati

In any organization or institution, the achievement of continuous improvement in the system is a matter of concern to top managers, and this can be very costly. The reason for this concern anxiety is ascribed to environmental changes and the new needs of addressees. Two paradigms; mechanical and organic are proposed for coping with this anxiety. Most designers and engineers of administrative systems consider the way of reforming and modernizing the organizations as an organic paradigm, and in its high level, as the theory of ‘’learning organizations’’. Using an analytical-logical method, this paper provides a critique of two paradigms based on library sources and direct observation. The finding of the research shows that the emphasis of some managers on the necessity of making changes in organizations through having good order in learning organization is not justified, and basically the necessity of selecting a mechanical or organic management model is grounded on the sophistry of ‘’non-compiled’’